Energy Future New Orleans
  • Home
  • Our Work
    • Clean Energy
    • False Solutions
    • Regulatory Transparency & Participation
    • Light is Your Right
  • News
  • Take Action
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Our Work
    • Clean Energy
    • False Solutions
    • Regulatory Transparency & Participation
    • Light is Your Right
  • News
  • Take Action
  • Contact Us

Grand Gulf

NUCLEAR STATION


​Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, which provides power to Entergy Louisiana & Entergy New Orleans customers in Louisiana, is a notoriously unreliable reactor that has suffered numerous safety and operational issues since starting operations in 1982, ultimately costing ratepayers billions of dollar ​in unjustifiable costs.
“NOPSI management sat on it’s hands for 10 years. They watched Grand Gulf cost come up and they simply put all their chips on forcing Grand Gulf’s costs down the throats of New Orleans ratepayers," said Alliance for Affordable Energy's Co-Founder, Gary Groesch. 

From the start, Grand Gulf has a long and legendary history of imposing inordinate costs on ratepayers. By the time construction of Grand Gulf was completed, the cost of the plant had increased from a projected total cost of $1.2 billion for both units to an excess of $3 billion for one unit. A FERC administrative law judge found that between now and 1993 the total amount which ratepayers will incur for Grand Gulf power will be $3 billion more than if the power were generated from existing units.
Picture

On March 2, 2021, the New Orleans City Council, Louisiana Public Service Commission, and Arkansas Public Service Commission filed a formal complaint against System Energy Resources (SERI), Entergy Services, Entergy Operations, and Entergy Corporation alleging that SERI has violated the obligation of prudent utility management in operating the Grand Gulf nuclear unit, resulting in large overcharges to its four affiliated customers, including Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans. 

The lawsuit demonstrates a history of failures that together have resulted in ratepayers being saddled with $1 Billion in unreasonable and excessive costs.
​

History of Failures

Frequent Outages

Picture
As reported by Michael Issac Stein for The Lens, "from 2016 through 2018, nuclear plants in the US produced about 92% of their maximum generating capacity on average, according to the US Energy Information Administration. But over that same period, Grand Gulf, plagued by persistent outages, produced only 55.5% of its capacity. 

According to a recent filing by the New Orleans City Council, Grand Gulf’s problems are continuing. Grand Gulf was offline for more than three weeks in late July and early August of 2022. Every week Grand Gulf was down that summer cost New Orleanians between $7-12 million.​
When Grand Gulf is experiencing an outage, it forces the operating companies to acquire replacement energy at much higher cost than the Grand Gulf energy cost, even as they continue to pay the enormous fixed costs of the unit. According to figures compiled by the Nuclear Energy Institute, Grand Gulf was top three in the least reliable nuclear plants in the U.S. from 2019-2021.

Safety Issues

Picture
Grand Gulf has been subject to heightened safety review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to a far greater extent than most nuclear power plants. The Complainants’ expert concluded that Grand Gulf is in the bottom 5% of the U.S. nuclear fleet with regard the Nuclear Safety Performance. More shocking is the NRC’s finding in 2018 that "deliberate" violations of safety protocols occurred at Grand Gulf.

As a result of System Energy’s imprudent operation of the plant and Grand Gulf’s poor safety performance, significant mitigation costs have been imposed on ratepayers. 

Imprudent Costs

Picture
In 2012, despite the already high costs imposed on ratepayers by Grand Gulf, SERI (the entity that owns Grand Gulf) elected to expend an additional approximately $800 million to uprate Grand Gulf. For this $800 million, SERI should have obtained 160 additional megawatts (MW); however, an ill-conceived sale/leaseback transaction resulted in the uprate increasing SERI's owned capacity by only about 142 MW.

In addition to the millions of dollars wasted, outages, and safety issues, Sam Karlin from the Advocate reported that regulators also allege that "Entergy improperly assessed ratepayers for various expenses." 
Those expenses include "$1.6 million of private airplane travel, lobbying expenses, advertisements promoting Entergy and industry association dues" (The Advocate). The lawsuit at FERC found that in total ratepayers have been saddled with more than $1.1 billion in unreasonable and excessive costs. ​​​

The Complaint at FERC

The basic principle underlying the complaint is that ratepayers should not have to continue to pay exceedingly high costs for consistently degraded and imprudent performance, or for the costs of SERI's continual safety violations. 

More specifically, t
he consequences of the imprudent operation of the Grand Gulf plant include:
  1. Entergy operating companies have been required to purchase replacement energy at a cost much higher than the low nuclear fuel cost of Grand Gulf, even as they continue to pay the enormous fixed costs of the unit.
  2. Unplanned shutdowns have disrupted regional energy supplies in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator ("MISO") region, causing shortages and cost increases in the region.
  3. SERI has incurred substantial costs attempting to comply with the NRC requirements and increased oversight required to mitigate its failure to adequately address safety issues, a cost imprudently incurred and improperly passed through to consumers.
  4. SERI incurred increased costs attempting to address operational issues stemming from mismanagement, these increase costs also are charged to consumers.  ​
View the Full Complaint

New Orleanians Deserve Better


​​The complainants are seeking a modification of the Unit Power Sales Agreement (UPSA) to:
  1. Tie cost recovery to Grand Gulf's performance level going forward
  2. Secure refunds for costs that would not have been incurred but for SERI’s imprudent management actions
  3. Adopt a new ratemaking procedure for SERI to ensure that adequate economic analysis of alternatives is performed prior to making major new investments in Grand Gulf
​
EFNO has been working diligently for years to hold corporate utilities like Entergy accountable for profiteering at the expense of Louisiana ratepayers. There are few clearer examples of Entergy’s malfeasance as an energy provider than its over-charging ratepayers for ‘maintenance’ of the barely functional Grand Gulf Station because of uncertainty over its tax liability. 

We urge that the FERC, LSPC, and CNO continue to press Entergy on issues pertaining to Grand Gulf to ensure that ratepayers are made adequately whole with these refunds. EFNO looks forward to continuing its work with regulators and policymakers to ensure that Entergy does not avoid its obligations to ratepayers as established by this decision.
​

Follow the Lawsuit

JANUARY 2023

Emergency motion in response to Entergy's Press Release
January 3, 2023

DECEMBER 2022

Entergy Issues a Press Release
December 26, 2022

FERC Sides with the LPSC in it's complaint against Entergy
December 23, 2022

June 2022

Entergy offered a $588M settlement to end allegations at Grand Gulf. Should Louisiana agree? By Sam Karlin
June 23, 2022

March 2021

LPSC, CNO & APSC File Formal Complaint with FERC
March 2, 2021

The Energy Future New Orleans Coalition is:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Copyright © 2023 · Energy Future New Orleans