|
From the start, Grand Gulf has a long and legendary history of imposing inordinate costs on ratepayers. By the time construction of Grand Gulf was completed, the cost of the plant had increased from a projected total cost of $1.2 billion for both units to an excess of $3 billion for one unit. A FERC administrative law judge found that between now and 1993 the total amount which ratepayers will incur for Grand Gulf power will be $3 billion more than if the power were generated from existing units. |
|
As reported by Michael Issac Stein for The Lens, "from 2016 through 2018, nuclear plants in the US produced about 92% of their maximum generating capacity on average, according to the US Energy Information Administration. But over that same period, Grand Gulf, plagued by persistent outages, produced only 55.5% of its capacity.
According to a recent filing by the New Orleans City Council, Grand Gulf’s problems are continuing. Grand Gulf was offline for more than three weeks in late July and early August of 2022. Every week Grand Gulf was down that summer cost New Orleanians between $7-12 million. |
|
Grand Gulf has been subject to heightened safety review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to a far greater extent than most nuclear power plants. The Complainants’ expert concluded that Grand Gulf is in the bottom 5% of the U.S. nuclear fleet with regard the Nuclear Safety Performance. More shocking is the NRC’s finding in 2018 that "deliberate" violations of safety protocols occurred at Grand Gulf.
As a result of System Energy’s imprudent operation of the plant and Grand Gulf’s poor safety performance, significant mitigation costs have been imposed on ratepayers. |
|
In 2012, despite the already high costs imposed on ratepayers by Grand Gulf, SERI (the entity that owns Grand Gulf) elected to expend an additional approximately $800 million to uprate Grand Gulf. For this $800 million, SERI should have obtained 160 additional megawatts (MW); however, an ill-conceived sale/leaseback transaction resulted in the uprate increasing SERI's owned capacity by only about 142 MW.
In addition to the millions of dollars wasted, outages, and safety issues, Sam Karlin from the Advocate reported that regulators also allege that "Entergy improperly assessed ratepayers for various expenses." |